*squeee!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!*

[eregyrn]

Props to janedavitt for the notification...



http://www.gateworld.net/news/2006/03/richarddeanandersonreturns.shtml

AAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHH!!!!

RDA/Jack's coming back for the 200th episode!

(Which will apparently be a sort of sequel to the 100th, "Wormhole X-Treme!" -- and to be honest, while that was not my favorite all-time humor ep when it aired, it has grown on me since then, and frankly at this point, I'm willing to go with whatever -- up to and including Damian Kindler's stupid jokes, and you KNOW what a concession that is from me -- so long as *they* all are having fun with it.)

And that's not all! AAAAAHHH!

First: that's going to be more than just a little cameo. w00t!

Second: he'll be guesting in some *other* S10 eps!!! ( [sarcasm]Gosh, does that mean we might actually find out what Jack is DOING?[/sarcasm].)

Third: he'll be guesting on *SGA*!!!!! (This excites me a good bit, simply because, I totally wasn't expecting it.)

Naturally, you may take as read all possible caveats and the usual fannish fretting. (Oh please, writers, don't screw it up and make me wish we'd been better off not knowing, etc.) Right now, I'm in the Happy Place. Determinedly so.

Comments

[barkley.livejournal.com]

Yeah, me too. And then I figured that if that's who it is, there's no use trying to stay spoiler free for the next five months. So I clicked!

[eregyrn.livejournal.com]

*nods* It's kinder on your nerves to just *know*. I was, honest to god, trying to be not entirely obvious about it. (As I said to telepresence: there are, um, maybe some other casting spoilers that could make me squee! Truly!) But I'm also guessing that there's going to be folks who word their cut-tags in such a way that it's impossible to avoid figuring it out. (In truth, when I saw Jane post about it, I did believe for a second that the Casting Spoiler might turn out to be someone else; she had a better poker-face than me.)

[barkley.livejournal.com]

I mean, it's better that you squeed! That way I know about this earlier and can have tons of time being joyful and reading cut tags. Even if no one on the internet posts about it (which totally isn't going to happen) Sci-Fi will probably advertise the hell out of it in an unavoidable way! So now I have months of fun ahead of me!

[janedavitt.livejournal.com]

Heh, my first subject line was 'Yes!!!!!' and I realised I just couldn't do that; it was incredibly hard phrasing it calmly and telling people what it was about without giving it away.

Although I don't really see it as a spoiler in the sense of revealing that someone dies, or a major plot twist; a character who is still alive and mentioned on the show now and then, appearing in an episode, is a lower-level spoiler. It's not like you can extrapolate plot from it.

But I do appreciate totally that some people want to be 100% spoiler-free and I still remember Giles returning in the Sg Buffy finale and the immediate fade to commercials and my husband and I leaping up and shrieking 'Giles is back! Yes! Yes!' so, heh, maybe it IS a proper spoiler :-)