For the SG-interested...
Dec. 20th, 2004 06:09 pmSciFi-wire and Gateworld have both put up additional info about S9 Cast Addition, regarding what kind of character is being added. No name yet, though. And no word I can find on the signing of other regulars.
http://www.scifi.com/scifiwire2005/index.php?category=0&id=30002
Gateworld article (had a spoiler in the *link*! Geez! But has less info than the SciFi piece).
Not as wacky or creative an idea as many proposed by fans in the past week. But I'm willing to see what they do with it. Making him the *same* rank as Sam is... interesting. Also makes me wonder what's going on with AT, although Ron Cooper mentions Carter, so... hmm. The idea of making him someone "known" is also kind of interesting, and I'm curious to see how they do that.
Hmm. At what point will we be able to stop considering the mere identity of the Cast Addition a spoiler, do you figure?
http://www.scifi.com/scifiwire2005/index.php?category=0&id=30002
Gateworld article (had a spoiler in the *link*! Geez! But has less info than the SciFi piece).
Not as wacky or creative an idea as many proposed by fans in the past week. But I'm willing to see what they do with it. Making him the *same* rank as Sam is... interesting. Also makes me wonder what's going on with AT, although Ron Cooper mentions Carter, so... hmm. The idea of making him someone "known" is also kind of interesting, and I'm curious to see how they do that.
Hmm. At what point will we be able to stop considering the mere identity of the Cast Addition a spoiler, do you figure?
no subject
Date: 2004-12-20 11:19 pm (UTC)I mean, it could be made to work. I'm just wary.
(I'm going to treat him as a spoiler until he appears on the screen, personally; that's my rule about this sort of thing, though I very much doubt anyone will avoid the news that BB is coming onboard. I really think it would be decent behavior not to post anything about the character outside of spoiler-cuts, though. I know there are people who want to avoid that knowledge.)
no subject
Date: 2004-12-21 01:23 am (UTC)*goes to hide under the bed*
no subject
Date: 2004-12-21 01:27 am (UTC)See, I knew they wouldn't leave it open at the end of the season, dammit, I knew it!
(Okay, I don't know it yet. But it does look awfully suspicious, doesn't it?)
no subject
Date: 2004-12-21 02:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-12-21 02:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-12-21 02:46 am (UTC)Um. That would pretty much break the show for me. I really, really hope that's not true.
no subject
Date: 2004-12-22 04:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-12-21 04:18 am (UTC)It would make some sense. Although... okay, wait.
1. Isn't it more likely, what with one thing and another, that if Jack and Sam wanted to be together, Jack would retire?
2. Including, more likely given the logistics of the show (RDA's reduced time, etc.)?
3. Would Sam have to retire from the military *too*? Both of them?
4. If Sam retires from the military so that she can marry Jack or whatever, does that mean Jack stays a general? Does that mean that they're currently thinking they're still going to have Jack as a general somehow in S9?
5. If Sam retires from the military to be with Jack, does she still get to stay in the SGC as a civilian scientist because, you know, she's too valuable to say to her, "don't let the door hit you on the ass on your way out"? Because Cooper's quotes *seem* to indicate that he's thinking about "SG-1" as Daniel, Teal'c, Sam, and BB.
6. But like Destina, I still don't get how you can have two lt. col's on the same team. That's dumb.
7. How might the AUs play into this?
My head hurts.
no subject
Date: 2004-12-22 04:09 am (UTC)There's a story on Gateworld RE S9 and Jack/RDA, incidentally--I don't want to talk about it if you haven't read it.
no subject
Date: 2004-12-22 04:29 am (UTC)Wait, what was I talking about?
no subject
Date: 2004-12-23 03:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-12-23 12:31 am (UTC)I don't know *WHAT* to think...
no subject
Date: 2005-01-02 05:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-12-21 04:21 am (UTC)I am seriously going to have to wrestle with myself over the issue of reading peoples' spoilers for "Threads" onwards -- because on the other hand, sometimes I like to find out ahead of time what happens, in detail, if I'm worried about something and feel that I might need to be braced for it.
But I already sort of get the sense, without spoilers, that most folks deeply disliked "Gemini". And that's a pity. RepliCarter had such promise!
no subject
Date: 2004-12-21 04:13 am (UTC)But yes. That detail immediately *pinged* warning bells in my head...
no subject
Date: 2004-12-21 04:12 am (UTC)Case in point -- when Adam Baldwin played Col. Dixon, it was clear that Jack knew him from before. Because he was calling Jack "Jack", and Jack was calling him "Dave", even when they were talking over the MALP. That implied to me that Col. Dixon had been a team-leader for longer than just that episode, and/or that Jack and he knew each other from before. (Because except for Ferretti, I don't think Jack ever calls other team-leaders by their first names.)
So, you know. Could be not-so-bad. Depending on how it's done.
For example -- could he have been a pilot in the F-302 program? Didn't somebody have to be squadron-leader or something of the group of those that engaged in the dogfight in "Lost City"? Wouldn't that somebody be someone Jack and maybe the others know? etc.
(It's not that I'm not worried, mind you. It's that I'm trying hard not to panic.)
I agree, too -- am personally planning to hold off on mentioning BB as the new cast member until perhaps he appears in promos or something; and yes, all character info belongs behind spoiler-cuts until S9 premieres.
no subject
Date: 2004-12-21 04:46 am (UTC)My next thought is that they can easily slot him into SG-1 by changing all the billetting. I mean, it's not like it's strict in makeup how it is. Sam's been promoted from Captain to Major without leaving the team. And she's currently leading it as on 05 when it was billetted as an 06 slot. So maybe they'll promote her again.
no subject
Date: 2004-12-21 05:25 am (UTC)I mean, not that they couldn't be all, like, "details waived on account of saving the Earth" -- but they've tended to try not to do that, from what I've seen. (If estimates of Sam's time in service are correct, her promotion from captain to major was likely overdue, as was her promotion from major to lt. col -- if you figure that somebody in the SGC ought to be on a fast-track to promotion, what with all the world-saving and all.)
Or maybe I have it all wrong.
no subject
Date: 2004-12-22 04:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-12-23 12:35 am (UTC)For example -- could he have been a pilot in the F-302 program? Didn't somebody have to be squadron-leader or something of the group of those that engaged in the dogfight in "Lost City"? Wouldn't that somebody be someone Jack and maybe the others know? etc.
Damn, I'm good!
I hear you on the flashbacks deal -- but the best-case scenario for those I could imagine would be that they go back and show us something we have already seen, and then in the new flashbacks, show us other things going on that we didn't see at the time.
And that, I'm fine with.
I totally agree with you about *changing* rather than *adding to*.
But the new info from BW makes it sound like it's the latter.
Somebody always had to be the guy who led the squadron that went into that dogfight -- we just never knew who he was. But in another show, or from another perspective, *that guy* would have been an interesting character to follow in his own right.
Oh, and now it looks like we do get to follow him.
Interesting path for them to decide to take.
(I'm still all in a tizzy with regard to the Jack situation, plus with Sam. I hear you, that in many ways the solution of Sam becoming a civilian would make several things possible and make them make sense. But... I still wouldn't *like* it. For a couple of reasons. *shrug*)
no subject
Date: 2005-01-02 05:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-12-20 11:49 pm (UTC)I fear Cooper's comments. Because as much as I love Stargate, I'm not sure the writers have the chops to pull off a character intro that's as tricksy and clever as they're making this sound. The SG-1 team already knows him? He's secretly been all important but we've never seen him before? Flashbacks will weave him into the universe?
Fear.
no subject
Date: 2004-12-21 04:24 am (UTC)As I pointed out -- when they created Col. Dixon, they created him as an instant old-buddy of Jack's, sort of. It wasn't explained, it was just there. But it gave him a different feel than if he'd been "the new colonel".
My suggestion above is only one way they could give the new lt. col. cred in the universe in a logical way, even if the audience hasn't seen him. The audience hasn't seen a *LOT* of folks who have worked for the SGC or done other important things over the years.
(This is my super-rational attempt to stave off the Fear, mind you. It's not that I'm not worried like everybody else.)
no subject
Date: 2004-12-21 12:01 am (UTC)Now, if he ends up being leader of SG-1, I dunno, Carter deserves it more, which begs the question of how long SG-1 will still be a three member team with BB's inclusion.
I'm still very excited as a StarScaper though ;-)
From SciFi: Browder's SG-1 Role Revealed
Date: 2004-12-21 03:02 pm (UTC)Robert C. Cooper, executive producer of SCI FI Channel's original series Stargate SG-1, told SCI FI Wire that new regular cast member Ben Browder (Farscape) will play a new military member of the SG-1 team. "Ben is playing a military guy, a lieutenant colonel," Cooper said in an interview. "And I can't tell you his name yet. It hasn't been legally cleared yet, so it could still change."
Browder's character, who joins the show in the upcoming ninth season, has a past history with the Stargate program, Cooper said. "The audience just hasn't met him yet," he said. "He's actually played a key role in some major events that went on ... in the Stargate universe and was in fact very instrumental in helping SG-1 succeed in one of their more important missions. And as a result of that, he was given ... his choice posting. And he ultimately chooses to join SG-1. So when he first appears on the show, SG-1 will already know who he is. And we'll see some of those scenes and how he was basically woven into the tapestry of the show through flashbacks."
Cooper said that Stargate SG-1 will embark on a new direction in the upcoming ninth season. "One of the things we've always done with Stargate ... [is] to reinvent ourselves all the time, and ... bring in new villains and anything we needed to do to keep the show fresh," he said. "And yet we still, I think, stuck to the core concept and the core team that started out at the beginning. And so fans of the show will still feel as though things are very comfortable and familiar, you know? We're still going to see Daniel Jackson and Teal'c and Carter and our new colonel going through the Stargate to alien worlds and getting into adventures. But there's going to be some big new dangers as well. We [will wrap] up a lot of storylines in season eight. And I think that, hopefully, fans are going to be very satisfied by the conclusion of season eight, and feel like we've really paid off a lot of the stories we've been building up over the last couple of years. And we're looking at season nine to start fresh with some new stories and a new take on the Stargate universe." The remaining new episodes of Stargate SG-1's eighth season kick off Jan. 21, 2005, in a new Friday 8 p.m. ET/PT timeslot, followed by the new episodes of Stargate Atlantis at 9 p.m. and the new original series Battlestar Galactica at 10 p.m. The ninth season of SG-1 will begin airing in the summer.