Selective Lemming-ing...

[eregyrn]

I totally resisted the TSUNAMI of LJ auto-posting that went around, but of course I can't resist quizzes.

I don't see how this result is possible, though...





(I feel the results of this quiz would have been quite different if they'd put in more choices of the "no, but I kind of wish I did" and "once, back in the mists of time" variety...)

Comments

[jenlev.livejournal.com]

Hee! You're right. :)

Ps. I really do like the word "Lemming-ing".

[eregyrn.livejournal.com]

When you are a Cool Nerd King, you can make up your own words. Trufax!

[jenlev.livejournal.com]

Sounds fair to me. :)

[cityofbeige.livejournal.com]

Considering that while some people would spend $70 on a thick graphic novel, and I would spend that much on a math textbook, I'm not surprised by my results.

[cityofbeige.livejournal.com]

Also, while most people have a paper journal for writing thoughts or drawing sketches, I have one for writing down equations and deriving algorithms.

[eregyrn.livejournal.com]

*raises eyebrow*

You know, I'm looking at your scores and I'm thinking they should have *deducted* cool points for super-high scores in science/math... That makes you a NERD KING, yes, but I'm questioning the "uber cool" part...

[eregyrn.livejournal.com]

See, I feel almost like I cheated on mine, because I have a far higher science/math/tech/computer score than I ought to, on account of having gotten my college math credits only by taking a Pascal programming course that also introduced us to a couple of other programming languages. So, the test should make distinctions between things you "know" how to do and things you really do know how to do.

... I would spend $70 on a thick graphic novel, but it would depend very heavily on who it was by.

I would never in all my life spend that much on a math textbook. Not *voluntarily*.