Now they've gone too far...
Apr. 29th, 2004 05:03 pm...all the way over into Arrant Stupidity. I'm talking about marketing wonks, both in general and those who work for the Gap in particular.
Yesterday, I bought some new pants at the Gap. Sort of striped, cotton, slightly-stretchy bootcut trousers, to be precise (plus, they were on sale). That's fine. What's got me scratching my head is the fact that on their website, the Gap describes the color of these pants as "vicuna". (Apparently they don't want to confuse the issue by the inclusion of the tilda.)
So I'm looking at these things on-screen, and I'm thinking, "Well, I personally would call that 'taupe', but, whatever..." Because god knows, by this point I am used to marketing wonks and their incontrollable urge to find newer and fancier terms for basic colors. Spend a couple of seasons shopping with J.Jill and learning to tell the difference between "aubergine" and "mulberry", or "sunset" and "tangerine" (because "salmon" is now too pedestrian a term, I suppose), and you come to take it for granted then when you shop for womens' clothes, you're going to have to decode some weird color terms.
But -- I'm getting to the head-scratching part -- when I go to an actual store and find the pants, they're...green. Kind of an olive-y, sage-y green, but, you know, unmistakeably verdant. Not tan. Not taupe. And it's not just me. The girl behind the counter who has to call another store to see if they have my size in stock calls them "the green striped pants", and the girl at the store at which I pick them up calls them "the green striped pants".
And the thing is -- by no stretch of the imagination are VICUÑA green.
So, check me on this: now not only do the marketing wonks look pretentious by trying to come up with exotic terms for colors, but, they can look stupid as well by, clearly, misunderstanding the meaning and association of the exotic word they've chosen to represent a color. Brilliant.
Either that, or marketing has just reached a brave new frontier in which they have all decided that the exotic words they choose to represent colors no longer actually have to relate to the color! "Vicuna" sounds...well, I don't know what THEY think it sounds like, exotic and sophisticated and adventurous or something (because, c'mon people, it's a SKINNY MEMBER OF THE CAMELID FAMILY)...but I guess they think it sounds like something that women who buy at the Gap would want to associate with their clothes. And that's ever so much more valuable than, you know, that old-fashioned idea of actually conveying any information about the product.
Still, I like the pants.
(In deference to people who have Friended me recently, I make a solemn vow to try to remember to use the lj-cut thing more often. Because I do tend to go on, when I infrequently post.)
Yesterday, I bought some new pants at the Gap. Sort of striped, cotton, slightly-stretchy bootcut trousers, to be precise (plus, they were on sale). That's fine. What's got me scratching my head is the fact that on their website, the Gap describes the color of these pants as "vicuna". (Apparently they don't want to confuse the issue by the inclusion of the tilda.)
So I'm looking at these things on-screen, and I'm thinking, "Well, I personally would call that 'taupe', but, whatever..." Because god knows, by this point I am used to marketing wonks and their incontrollable urge to find newer and fancier terms for basic colors. Spend a couple of seasons shopping with J.Jill and learning to tell the difference between "aubergine" and "mulberry", or "sunset" and "tangerine" (because "salmon" is now too pedestrian a term, I suppose), and you come to take it for granted then when you shop for womens' clothes, you're going to have to decode some weird color terms.
But -- I'm getting to the head-scratching part -- when I go to an actual store and find the pants, they're...green. Kind of an olive-y, sage-y green, but, you know, unmistakeably verdant. Not tan. Not taupe. And it's not just me. The girl behind the counter who has to call another store to see if they have my size in stock calls them "the green striped pants", and the girl at the store at which I pick them up calls them "the green striped pants".
And the thing is -- by no stretch of the imagination are VICUÑA green.
So, check me on this: now not only do the marketing wonks look pretentious by trying to come up with exotic terms for colors, but, they can look stupid as well by, clearly, misunderstanding the meaning and association of the exotic word they've chosen to represent a color. Brilliant.
Either that, or marketing has just reached a brave new frontier in which they have all decided that the exotic words they choose to represent colors no longer actually have to relate to the color! "Vicuna" sounds...well, I don't know what THEY think it sounds like, exotic and sophisticated and adventurous or something (because, c'mon people, it's a SKINNY MEMBER OF THE CAMELID FAMILY)...but I guess they think it sounds like something that women who buy at the Gap would want to associate with their clothes. And that's ever so much more valuable than, you know, that old-fashioned idea of actually conveying any information about the product.
Still, I like the pants.
(In deference to people who have Friended me recently, I make a solemn vow to try to remember to use the lj-cut thing more often. Because I do tend to go on, when I infrequently post.)
no subject
Date: 2004-04-29 02:31 pm (UTC)I have noticed in my mom's clothing catalogs that colors are often very weirdly named. I think the vicuña green takes the cake though.
no subject
Date: 2004-04-29 04:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-29 05:30 pm (UTC)For example: the person in charge of these things is woefully undersupervised, and thinks the word "vicuna" means something else, and nobody else along the professional path caught it, or knew better, or thought "maybe we should look up that word so we don't make fools of ourselves". Or: the people in charge of putting together the marketing terms only ever saw pictures of the fabric swatches on a computer, and as I said -- on *MY* computer, looking at the website, they did look legitimately tan. Or: they're playing some elaborate word-association game (vicunas = South America = the pampas = pampas grass). Or: they realize that it just doesn't matter as most women don't pay much attention to the word descriptions of colors any more.
Hell, they could have listed the color as "felucca" and it would make about as much sense.
It's perfectly true that the inaccuracy of the color description, while clearly intriguing me, had no bearing on my purchase (or not) of the trousers. I didn't storm out of the store because the color didn't match what I thought the description promised. But -- mostly that's because I went in expecting pants that were taupe, and found pants that were sage, but I like sage as well, and I said, "Okay, that'll do".
It would have been a different story if the description had said something like, "tiger", and I had gone in expecting something orange-y, only to find that it was in fact bright pink. Then I would have felt disappointment that it wasn't something I was prepared to buy, but was in fact something I wouldn't buy.
However, that might indeed be the clue to the word-association they're playing with. Because vicuña famously makes the finest of woven cloths, degrees finer than even alpaca. It's very rare and very expensive. So maybe the thinking was: "look, women aren't falling for these color-names any more, they know it's all bullshit, so let's use this term that women with a little knowledge of fashion will associate instead with a rare and high-quality cloth, which will give the product an air of sophistication".
It is certainly providing hours of enjoyable speculation!
no subject
Date: 2004-04-29 06:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-30 06:24 am (UTC)and, as for the length of your posts - just fine by me. i would much rather read a really long post about something of substance that a stupid short post (like mine tend to be) about something silly. so keep it up. i enjoy them.
no subject
Date: 2004-04-30 08:47 am (UTC)i don't mind the length of the posts either. i mean, orca_girl CAN go on, but these posts just aren't that long. and i'm not just saying that to excuse my own lengthy musings, either.
how do people put the little info icons in their posts? huh. LJ is endlessly distracting.
no subject
Date: 2004-04-30 09:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-30 09:06 am (UTC)perhaps a bit of this could be blamed on the prepondereance of political spin ("define 'the'..."), and the overwhelming, nigh unavoidable media blitz that surrounds us, but i really do think that people are stupid, and can be led easily like sheep. that said... what do you mean "info icons"?
no subject
Date: 2004-04-30 09:08 am (UTC)i have a low opinion of marketing. and if there is any way to change my mind, i will certainly be receptive, as i do not wish to offend anyone who does this for a living.
no subject
Date: 2004-04-30 09:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-30 09:19 am (UTC)Yeah, that's an interesting point -- there's a whole other level of word/color association going on in the realms of paint marketing, where the descriptions have become poetic and therefore completely subjective. They *are* meant to convey mood. I'm with you -- I don't seen why chartreuse should embody California dreamin'.
But "vicuna" is just a bit too concrete to fall into this category, I think. It's not playing the allegorical/mood game with colors, at least, I can't imagine that it is. It's playing the "example" game with colors. The game in which you have something that's a dark, purplish red, so you run through all of the associative "example" words -- garnet, merlot, aubergine, mulberry. (I've noticed how this color, which once would have been called "wine", is now almost always called "merlot" or "cabernet" nowadays, if they are going for that association.)
The thing is, I could sit around and come up with plenty of words to describe this color of green; I could even come up with things, nouns or objects, that would be associative and that would further evoke some kind of response to the greater associations of the word. Call it "prairie", and you suggest something just ever so slightly culturally different from "pampas". Or you could call it "travertine"; you'd still be wrong, but the idea of shifting over into the category of stones is an interesting one.
See, what lies at the root of this post is: I've always been *fascinated* by advertising and marketing. I feel as if I might have gone into that as a profession. It could have been a logical choice given my artistic bent, and the background in commercial art given to me by my father. I've always thought I would have liked it because it seems like it could be a fun puzzle. But I'm smart enough to know that the reality of the business would probably crush my soul, which is why, you know, I'm sitting here at a desk at Harvard shepherding folklore students.
no subject
Date: 2004-04-30 12:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-30 12:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-30 02:35 pm (UTC)have you noticed that names go through popularity phases? burgundy used to be the name of the color that is now commonly called merlot and cabernet. check out the lower part of this page ( www.behr.com/behrx/inspiration/fashionable_3.jsp ) for colors and the names that behr has given them - i find it interesting to see colors that i would normally give actually color names to, they are calling 'hallowed hush' or some such thing...(and yeah - there is that paint obsession that i am having at the moment, the closer i get to being allowed to paint...) i am pretty fascinated by the whole 'trend' thing for colors - would like to be one of those people who make the decision about what is the next 'hot' color, you know? a few years ago it was 70s avocado green. why? i just wonder... yeah, it would crush your soul eventually, but it would be damned interesting in the short term. have you read william gibson's most recent book "pattern recognition"? it is partly talking about this entire phenomenon - how trends start, and how business can take advantage of them and market them. interesting read, but then i am a freak for his books, so take that opinion with a grain of salt.
no subject
Date: 2004-05-05 11:24 am (UTC)"Black: it's the new brown, which was the new black!"
Fashion -- "FEH!"
;)
Erskine